This panel discussion on the two state solution set out to engage with the following questions and problems:
How do we hold a productive discussion around the issues and solutions when key players and thinkers struggle to even agree on terms of engagement? How can we give voice to political disagreement in a way that is meaningful rather than just retreading old conflicts? Is boycott an appropriate response to those with whom we disagree? And if we can’t come together to discuss these issues openly, with representatives from across the community, then what hope is there for constructive debate?
I’ve only sampled the opening presentations so far. If you have time to listen – I’d be interested in readers’ thoughts on the six panellists.
Hat tip: Zkharya
